Do nutritional facts take into account the inedible parts of certain foods?

Do nutritional facts take into account the inedible parts of certain foods? - High angle of crop anonymous housewife taking raw chicken egg from paper container for preparing breakfast in kitchen

I was wondering if the caloric values of leftovers of certain foods (may the best example be bones, when eating chicken) that are never eaten, taken into account when calculating nutrition values of prepared meals. Most importantly when vendor/food outlet is obligated to put them on the packaging/leaflets.

I can't find a paper with detailed methodology of such calculations nowhere in the internet.



Best Answer

Nutritional values are based on Servings, not on the whole product, so it is realistic to assume that the values are based on what is actually to be consumed.

As for the second part of your question, I would refer you to this site that simplifies FDA labeling and nutrition requirements:

https://www.foodpackaginglabels.net/food-labeling-requirements/




Pictures about "Do nutritional facts take into account the inedible parts of certain foods?"

Do nutritional facts take into account the inedible parts of certain foods? - From above of anonymous male taking tasty organic almonds from pile of nuts placed on white background isolated illustrating healthy food concept
Do nutritional facts take into account the inedible parts of certain foods? - Woman taking whole unpeeled kiwi from wooden board
Do nutritional facts take into account the inedible parts of certain foods? - Top view of crop anonymous person taking slice of yummy pizza with tomato and oregano placed on checkered tablecloth



How are nutrition facts determined?

According to the National Data Lab (NDL), most of the calorie values in the USDA and industry food tables are based on an indirect calorie estimation made using the so-called Atwater system. In this system, calories are not determined directly by burning the foods.

How accurate do nutrition facts have to be?

It depends on the food matrix and the nutrient, but in general NIST's measurements are accurate to within 2% to 5% for nutrient elements (such as sodium, calcium and potassium), macronutrients (fats, proteins and carbohydrates), amino acids and fatty acids.

Do nutrition facts lie?

But nutritional labels can be up to 20% inaccurate, according to the FDA guidelines. That means, for example, that a serving of Greek yogurt labeled to contain 100 calories could actually weigh in at 80 to 120 calories.

Which of the following is not required on a nutrition facts panel?

The correct answer is D. The Nutrition Facts panel gives us information such as the serving size, servings per container, percentage of calories in each serving, amounts of nutrients, vitamins, minerals, and the percent daily value. It does not include the ingredients found in the food.



Surprisingly Edible (and healthy) Parts Of Foods




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Klaus Nielsen, Karolina Grabowska, Any Lane, Alena Shekhovtcova