Do foods labeled "non-GMO" only (and not "organic") have more pesticides in them?
I know
- organic = non-GMO + no pesticides (source);
- non-GMO = pesticides possibly used;
- pesticide-free = possibly GMO.
Do non-GMO foods actually have more pesticides in them?
Best Answer
No. "No-GMO" means exactly that. There is no Genetically Modified Organism in the content of your purchase.
In general you GMO your veggies and wheat (and others) so you don't need to use pesticides on them because they are designed to be more resistant.
So yes, your question
Do non-GMO foods actually have more pesticides in them?
come from that logic. You need to spray food from outside because it's not resistant on it's own. So the amount of chemicals per tone (or hectare) is higher in "non GMO" than it is in GMO.
Organic thought it totally depended on law. In EU to call something organic you need to stay below certain quota of pesticides per hectare (in big generalisation, you can read more here EU law on organic production)
BUT
There is doubt about what you call PESTICIDE. Because you can use synthetic one (Like the one Monsato is making) or natural one (like tobacco). The first one is more to be used in big industrial farms, while natural can be easily made in small farms where it's more financially better to have their own plot of natural pesticide.
Pictures about "Do foods labeled "non-GMO" only (and not "organic") have more pesticides in them?"
Does non-GMO mean no pesticide?
Basically, although non-GMO provides guarantees against the use of GMOs, it doesn't mean they haven't been sprayed with pesticides. On the other hand, no chemical pesticides are used ever on organic seeds.Do non organic foods have pesticides?
Yes, conventional foods have more synthetic pesticide residues than organic ones, on average.Do organic foods have less pesticide residue than non organic foods?
Compared with produce grown using usual (conventional) methods, organically grown produce has lower levels of pesticide residue.Are non-GMO foods healthier?
Nutritional considerations Today's Dietitian explains that research has shown no nutritional benefit to choosing organic versus nonorganic foods3. While a consumer may also have sustainability concerns, no significant nutrition or health effects can be attributed to organic products.Organic vs Non-GMO Food - What's The Difference \u0026 Which Is Better?!
More answers regarding do foods labeled "non-GMO" only (and not "organic") have more pesticides in them?
Answer 2
This 2016 NPR post, which relies on some scientific studies, claims there is no clear answer on whether foods labeled “non-GMO” have more pesticides in them than GMO foods:
Pesticides include both insecticides and herbicides. Backers of GMOs point to the example of crops containing new genes that fight off insect pests, so farmers don't have to spray insecticides. Biotech critics point to the example of crops that have been altered to tolerate specific weedkillers, like glyphosate, thus encouraging farmers to rely more heavily on those herbicides.
They cite the 2016 study {1}, which draws a mixed conclusion. Interestingly they note that:
the results indicate that the difference in pesticide use between GE (= genetically engineered) and non-GE adopters has changed significantly over time.
which makes the answer to the question more complex than it first seems.
References:
- {1} Perry, Edward D., Federico Ciliberto, David A. Hennessy, and GianCarlo Moschini. "Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in US maize and soybeans." Science advances 2, no. 8 (2016): e1600850. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/8/e1600850
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Anna Tarazevich, Anna Tarazevich, Anna Tarazevich, Aleksandar Pasaric