When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meat

I have read that slow cookers manufactured recently (not sure what time period that actually means) rise to their cooking temperature faster because of FDA concerns of keeping a food at a dangerous temperature for too long. The recommendation is to perhaps cook things for a bit less time than the typical 8 hours on low to avoid overcooking.

To this end, I have been putting a thermometer in my meat and cooking to a temperature instead of to any set time. However, I'm finding the meat gets to its "done" temperature at WELL below the time suggested. For example, I have a chicken recipe (skinless, boneless) that suggests cooking for 8 hours on low. In my slow cooker, the chicken gets to 165 degrees at only 2-1/2 or 3 hours! Well below the 8 hour suggested cooking time.

So, my question is, should I say my meal is done at that 165 degree mark, or is there any slow cooker advantage to leaving it in for the full or close to full cooking time? It seems to me the meat just gets dry if I leave it in longer, but maybe if I left it in the full 7-8 hours, some other chemical process takes place, leaving the meat more moist and flavorful than if I take it out at the 3 hour mark because of the temperature.

Best Answer

The answer depends on the type of cut. If you have a tender cut of meat then there's no reason to cook it any longer than then desired doneness. If you are using a tough cut then there's lots of collagen that needs to be broken down, and that requires moisture and time. You want to cook it until all the collagen is broken down as that will make the meat tender. That may take 2 hours, it may take 6, it depends on the cut and the thickness.

I have a similar experience with my slow cooker, it goes way too fast. To get around this I've ended up putting in big chunks of meat and veggies because anything else is completely nuked after 8 hours! I've also thought about using a light timer to have it start 3 hours after I leave home.

Pictures about "When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meat"

When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meat - Free stock photo of baking, barbecue, beef

When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meat - Cooked Food on White Ceramic Plate

When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meat - Person Holding Pastry Dishes on White Ceramic Plates

Does internal temp matter when slow cooking?

Due to heat exchange between the meat and its environment, the meat gets warmer until it reaches the slow cooking temperature. From that point on, until the end of the cooking process, the core temperature is the same as the slow cooking temperature.

Does meat get more tender the longer it cooks in a slow cooker?

Tough cuts that did a lot of work in the animal's life will become more tender the longer it cooks until it becomes stringy and dry. Softer, leaner cuts will become tougher the longer it cooks as they don't need to tenderize first. So in general, slow cooking meat gets better with time but only up until a point.

What temperature is slow cooking done at?

What temperature does a slow cooker cook at? Slow cookers will generally heat up to about 190-210 degrees Fahrenheit (~87-99 degrees Celsius) on the Low setting and can go up to about 300 degrees Fahrenheit (~149 degrees Celsius) on the High setting.

How long does it take for meat to cook in a slow cooker?

Slow Cookers \u2013 Times, Temperatures and TechniquesMeat CutMeat WeightLow cook timePork Loin3-4 lbs6 hoursPoultry6 lbs7 1/2 hoursBeef Roast3-4 lbs8 hoursStew meat3 lbs6 hours2 more rows•Feb 6, 2014

I COOKED a Brisket for a MONTH and this happened!

More answers regarding when is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meat

Answer 2

The target temperatures you describe are based on food safety recommendations, not quality of product. With chicken, for example, it is safe at 165f. However, I prefer the dark meat to get to 180f, give or take (I go by visual and tactile qualities, not by temperature). If you want to make pulled pork or beef, the meat has to get up to around 200f. Same goes for shredded chicken, even -- the temperature has to get pretty far beyond the safe range for the meat to be shreddable.

So I think the answer to your question is you should go by NEITHER time nor temperature, as long as your quality target exceeds your safety target.

I'm also going to go out on a limb and suggest that there may be some fault with the recipe itself. A slow cooker does not lend itself to cooking something like chicken pieces, where there is a lot of surface area in relation to the total mass of meat you are cooking. Additionally, unless you are intending to shred the chicken, I don't think cooking it for so long would be of any benefit. A slow cooker is better suited to a large cut of meat with lots of connective tissue, like a Chuck roast or a Boston butt, and the time/temperature caters to that type of cooking.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Rachel Claire, Ron Lach, ROMAN ODINTSOV, Pixabay