Using other liquid than water when making stock
I got to thinking... I usually hear chefs (particularly Alton Brown as of late, since I am watching Good Eats) say that water is neutral and should only be used as a last resort, serving only to dilute without adding anything to the mix (when it comes to sauces and the like).
I made a stock once, that came out a little boring, so I was thinking. What if I use a lager, or even a light ale instead? (light as in not dark, not calorie-free). I'd possibly need to degas it first to get rid of the CO2, but I think it sounds kind of delicious...
Has anyone tried this before, or can anyone think of any reason not to? Would the flavor be weird, what about other liquids? Is it commonly done?
Best Answer
There's no particular reason you couldn't prepare a stock with something other than water, but it's the equivalent of buying a ream of heavy pink paper, rather than plain white photocopy paper. If that's the effect you really want, great. The thing is, stock is meant to be as boring as plain white photocopy paper -- it is a foundation for other things, versatile and effective, subtly enhancing without overwhelming the dish. For your beer idea, for example, I would cook down a couple bottles and add some stock to it. That way, the rest of my batch of stock would be useful for other recipes that don't use beer.
Note that stock may be boring but shouldn't be flavorless; stock still should taste good. If your stock was flavorless, try upping the amount of meat, veggies, and herbs compared to bones. Also, bear in mind that stock should not contain salt (you will likely reduce the stock at some point). The lack of salt, however, will deaden the flavor. When you are ready to use the stock, be sure to add a pinch of salt.
Pictures about "Using other liquid than water when making stock"
Can you use stock instead of water?
There are some keys to amping up flavor when using water instead of stock. Make sure you really season your cooking liquid aggressively. Store-bought stock especially tends to have a lot of added salt, so if you're switching to water you're probably going to have to add more salt than you're used to adding.Is water better than broth?
The simple answer is yes, it's usually okay to substitute vegetable stock with water. In most recipes that call for vegetable stock, its main advantage over water is that it provides flavor, which is especially important if you're making vegetarian or vegan food that's missing the richness from meat.Can you add water to beef stock?
You can also cut the beef stock with water or use more chicken stock for more flavor. After you've finished deglazing, add the meat back into the pot and pour in your broth. Add water to cover everything by a half an inch or so. Bring the stew to a boil and then reduce the heat to low.The Ultimate Guide To Making Amazing Chicken Stock
More answers regarding using other liquid than water when making stock
Answer 2
A good stock is clean of oils and smells great. Flavour is going to be on the thin side. Consomme, which is what you are probably mentally comparing to, is a reduced beef stock with some added meat bits (a farce sp?) added to give it a flavour kick. A stock should never be that strong. Alton was probably saying that using water for braising and sauce making is bad, and he's right. The best sauces are made with great stocks as their base and then through reduction and additions of other flavouring agents and garnishes turned into things of beauty. A stock made with an ale sounds like a great experiment but it would be limited in it's uses. Braising some pork with a sweet dark ale is a great flavour enhancing dish. Play around and write down what works.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: cottonbro, Monstera, Og Mpango, Michelle Leman