Are cooking show minutes really minutes?
I've noticed that cooking show inches are not very accurate. I can usually see that the "half inch slices" called for by the chef are no where near that, which is fine, since I can see the thickness for myself. It only just occurred to me that cooking show minutes might be way off as well. If they say "put this under the broiler for five minutes" they could mean anywhere from two to ten minutes if their sense of time is as warped as their sense of distance. But the shows are edited for time, so I have no idea if they're fudging.
How literally do you interpret times given by cooking shows? Is there a fudge factor?
Best Answer
There is no single answer to that question: it is going to vary program by program. Some shows, like America's Test Kitchen, are going to be quite precise--at at least, they will intend to be. Other shows, not naming any names, less so.
The thing is, with very very few exceptions, you should not be cooking to time anyway. The time in a recipe is just a guideline so you have some expectation for logistical planning, and to know when to start testing.
Quality recipes--and quality television shows giving you recipes--should always give a test for when a food is done. This can vary from "pulls away from the side of the pan" for brownies, to "pulls apart easily with a fork" for a braised pork shoulder, to "internal temperature of 135 F" for a roast.
Even for shows that intend to give you very good time estimates, testing is still important, because there are many variables that effect how long it takes food to cook. For something as simple as a steak, the starting temperature of the steak, the thickness of the steak, the starting temperature of the pan and its thermal mass, and the power and setting of your burner (hob) will all effect how long it takes the steak to finish. You probably don't have the same room temperature as the test kitchen where the recipe was developed, the same stove, the exact same settings, and the same thickness of steak.
Such variables apply to almost all recipes. The test is what tells you when to stop cooking; the time is only an estimate.
As an aside, the few things that must be cooked to time are those that are 1) uniform in size and cooking properties; and 2) foods for which it is difficult or impossible to observe the effect of the cooking directly. The only two examples I can think of that are appropriate are cooking eggs in the shell, and roasted peanuts in the shell.
Pictures about "Are cooking show minutes really minutes?"
Do they really only get 20 minutes on Chopped?
Of all the Food Network shows, Chopped has a pretty simple concept: Four contestants duke it out in an appetizer, entr\xe9e, and dessert round. Oh, and they have to incorporate mystery ingredients into each dish...and they only have 30 minutes.How long should a cooking show be?
Most cooking shows are half an hour, which theoretically means the script should be about 22 pages long. However, the length of a cooking show script tends to be less because it usually involves only one person talking to the camera. So for a half-hour cooking show your script should be about 15 pages long.Are cooking shows fixed?
When famous hosts, chefs, and judges are involved, it makes the competition all the more serious. However, just as is the case for shows like The Real Housewives, food competition shows can also be fake, rigged, or not as nerve-racking as they appear.Do Chopped contestants get time to plan?
In a 2016 interview with Tasting Tables, "Chopped" winner Michael Vignola said that although the contestants get a tour of the pantry, they don't get to see the mystery ingredients ahead of time. Also, they don't get any extra off-camera time to come up with a recipe idea.Apple Cinnamon Balls Doctors Day Special |Healthy Recipe | 5 min Recipe Agha's Kitchen
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Charlotte May, Piotr Arnoldes, shutter_speed, Matthias Zomer