Should I read ingredient weight as prepared or unprepared weight?

Once I have made a recipe a couple of times, I tend to follow my instincts rather than strict portion sizes.

When following a new recipe, however, I have often wondered about how an ingredient's weight should be interpreted.

For example, if a recipe calls for 500g of pumpkin, diced into 1cm cubes, does convention expect me to use a 500g cut of pumpkin, that I then de-seed and dice, or 500g of 1cm pumpkin cubes pumpkins?

measurements

Best Answer

In your example, it means 500g pumpkin before preparing.

In general, you might see this two ways:

500g pumpkin. Dice the pumpkin.
500g diced pumpkin.

The first option refers to the weight before prepping while the second refers to the weight after prepping. In general, the second one is far more exact for the actual recipe while the first one is more exact for shopping. I assume ease of shopping plus presumption of yield is why the first one is so often used, although in high end cook books (Grant Achatz, Thomas Kellar, etc) the weights are often given post prep for precision.

You will see the same thing for volume measurements (i.e. one cup of nuts chopped vs one cup of chopped nuts).

Pictures about "Should I read ingredient weight as prepared or unprepared weight?"

Should I read ingredient weight as prepared or unprepared weight? - Foamy coffee and newspaper served on tray placed on chair

Should I read ingredient weight as prepared or unprepared weight? - Opened cookbook on table in kitchen

Should I read ingredient weight as prepared or unprepared weight? - From above view of fresh hot buns served on plates near opened book on table with various kitchenware in light kitchen

What does prepared weight mean?

To use a heavy object placed on top of a prepared food for the purpose of squeezing out excess fat or liquid, or to force a food to form to the contour of a mold.

How do you calculate weight in ingredients?

\u201cYou will obtain better accuracy when measuring by weight\u2026 Also, it is easier to precisely measure weight than volume. Because much of cooking is about controlling chemical reactions based on the ratio of ingredients (say, flour and water), changes in the ratio will alter your results, especially in baking.\u201d

Why should you measure ingredients by weight instead of volume?

In many contexts, we use scales to measure weight or mass. Different types of scales are used to measure different sizes of objects.

Weight Management \u0026 Nutrition Before, During and After Cancer Treatment

More answers regarding should I read ingredient weight as prepared or unprepared weight?

Answer 2

When I started cooking seriously I usually worked in terns of prepaed weights. However, my first thought (as a one-time scientist) is that although the recipe writer is may be lazy by not being exact in the specifications, I still take any recipe is just a starting point, and as I cook more I tend to keep checking and tweaking the recipe to try to get the right texture or taste according to the particular ingredients and the time of year. I have learned from my artistic partner who works in inexact units of bits, spashes , pinches, sploshes, and - especislly annoying - just enough ofs - until she's happy.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Klaus Nielsen, Ekrulila, ready made, ready made