Is there an upper time limit when simmering stock?
I'm making veal stock that's later going to be reduced to a glace viande.
In the past, I was always close enough to observe the process and strain the stock when done. I also realize that an hour or two and even longer isn't an issue when making stock.
But today I will be away for most of the day and my stock pot will remain unattended on the lowest possible heat on the stove. I don't expect any problems from this procedure. But it prompted a question:
How long could a pot of bone stock be simmered?
Is there an upper threshold when unwanted substances are extracted from the bones? When the flavour profile does not get "better" but starts to deteriorate?
Clarification:
- I am not talking about cooking a day or two, I know that this is typically no problem. And yes, if necessary I could add water to counter evaporation. For this question, you may assume "no time limit".
- I am familiar with the concept of perpetual stew. But for a perpetual stew, parts of the stock are removed and new ingredients added. I'm asking explicitly about one unchanged stock: a pot of bones in water, optionally some spices and mirepoix.
Best Answer
You could implement a perpetual stock, where you keep it simmering indefinitely and renew it by adding fresh ingredients over time. The tradition of keeping a perpetual stew boiling for weeks or even months dates back centuries, and was a way to keep the ingredients from going bad in days before refrigeration.
https://alehorn.com/2016/01/07/is-medieval-perpetual-stew-for-you/
If you just want to simmer a single pot of stock indefinitely, you can do that safely by adding water on a regular basis in small quantities (small enough that the stock temperature does not drop below 140 degrees) but if you're not using some and replacing the ingredients, over time (several days) the stock will eventually acquire a sort of acrid taste (speaking from personal experience.)
I think the issue is that there's a limited amount of the aromatic compounds which produce the desired flavor, and over time, these tend to evaporate. Replenishing water doesn't replenish the flavor. The smell of stock simmering means those aromatic compounds are now in the air and no longer in the pot. Eventually, the amount of nice flavoring compounds leaving the broth to the air exceeds what you can extract from the remaining bones etc. Oxidation of the remnants leads to a less pleasant flavor. There is also the question of the pot itself adding metallic flavors if the stock is at all acidic.
Pictures about "Is there an upper time limit when simmering stock?"
Quick Answer about "Is there an upper time limit when simmering stock?"
I find when making a chicken stock w/ wings, a drumstick and spine/backbone/trim, there's really no point in going over 4 or 5 hours. Add mirepoix in the final hour, and it should have enough flavor. I find that simmering the bones and onion and various veggies for 6-8 hours seems to dull the flavors.Can you simmer stock for too long?
Simmer Your Bones Long Enough, But Not Too Long Yet, if you cook your broth too long, it will develop overcooked, off-flavors that can become particularly unpleasant if you've added vegetables to the broth pot which tend to break down, tasting at once bitter and overly sweet.How long should you simmer stock?
(It helps draw out nutrients and minerals from the bones into the stock.) Simmer the stock for 6 to 8 hours, covered, keeping an eye on it to make sure it stays at a simmer. Strain the stock through a fine-meshed sieve. Let cool.What should be the maximum time limit in simmering the vegetable stock?
Do Not Overcook the Stock \u2013 Vegetable stock should cook at a low to medium simmer for about an hour. After simmering for about an hour, the vegetables will have given up most of their flavor anyways and if they cook too much longer, they can turn bitter and mushy.How often should you stir the stock as it is simmering?
There's never a need to stir a stock during simmering. Gently skim fats and impurities from the surface of the stock every half hour or so using a spoon to remove the foam that rises to the top. 4.Time Frame Continuity : Systematic Trades
More answers regarding is there an upper time limit when simmering stock?
Answer 2
A book I used to have (called simply soup) said the best stock they ever made in their restaurant was when they left a pot simmering for two days unexpectedly.
Making stock in a slow cooker is typically done for a minimum of 12 hours on high, and I often leave it longer so the cooling down takes place at convenient time. For dark stocks (as I usually make) the flavour doesn't deteriorate. Lighter stocks may well darken.
The limit is really evaporation - however well the pot is covered, if the stock is simmering or even soaking at a lower (but still safe) temperature this will be significant. To some extent it doesn't matter, but want the ingredients to be mostly covered, and you certainly don't want it boiling dry.
Answer 3
I find when making a chicken stock w/ wings, a drumstick and spine/backbone/trim, there's really no point in going over 4 or 5 hours. Add mirepoix in the final hour, and it should have enough flavor. I find that simmering the bones and onion and various veggies for 6-8 hours seems to dull the flavors.
If you want to strengthen the flavors, you should just Reduce the stock.
But if you're going for some kind of Mythical Ancient Village style stock, you could keep it going for days and days and days, topping it off with water. I could see this working better if you actually replaced the boiled-off simmering ingredients with fresh ones to fortify the stock.
Answer 4
I've made all my own stocks for forty years and finally found I got the best results from making them in a pressure cooker in an hour or less after first roasting the bones and vegetables in the oven.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: abdullah ., Danila Giancipoli, Max Fischer, Yan Krukov