Is baking by weight really more accurate?

Is baking by weight really more accurate? - Man in Gray Long Sleeve Shirt Standing Near Donuts

It's gospel among serious bakers that measuring by weight is far more accurate than measuring by volume. However, I'm not sure that measuring by weight helps at all when you have varying humidity levels. It seems to me that, if the recipe author has much higher or lower level of humidity in their kitchen than you do, measuring by weight would tend to make differences in water balance even worse.

For example, I recently made the same pizza dough recipe in my apartment (65F, 80% humidity) and at my in-laws (75F, 35% humidity). Getting the same texture of dough was a difference of 2/3 of a cup of water, or around 6oz of weight. This water already was clearly in the flour in my apartment, adding to its weight but adding somewhat less to its volume. This means that if a recipe was written by someone in Tuscon and I made it in San Francisco, I'd get a sticky mess of a dough without enough flour.

Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to make repeated experiments in measurement at different humidity levels to see if weight or volume is more accurate when the hydrometer is going up and down. Is anyone?



Best Answer

Is it more accurate? ABSOLUTELY

Does it mean that you can still follow a recipe by weight exactly and expect perfect results everytime? No

You're right in that humidity will vary the weight, but if you're consistently working in the same area with a small change in humidity - its not something to worry about. You'll adjust your recipe once and then generally stay in the same range. Going by volume, you're always going to be all over the board. Sometimes you'll pack light, sometimes tight. Going by weight, you're going to be pretty close as long as none of the variables have changed drastically.

The problem you run into is when you change locations or the humidity changes drastically. In the long run, you'll need to know what your expected dough should look and feel like. After you've baked a loaf 100 times, you'll poke it and know if its too dry.

In addition to the feel of the dough, I have a hygrometer in my kitchen. Keeping an eye on it lets me know if I should expect to need to add more or less water to my dough. I bake A LOT, so I keep an eye on this to make life easier.




Pictures about "Is baking by weight really more accurate?"

Is baking by weight really more accurate? - Brown Bread on Black Tray
Is baking by weight really more accurate? - Free stock photo of adult, at home, baking
Is baking by weight really more accurate? - Brown and White Bread on Black Plate



Quick Answer about "Is baking by weight really more accurate?"

You will obtain better accuracy when measuring by weight… Also, it is easier to precisely measure weight than volume. Because much of cooking is about controlling chemical reactions based on the ratio of ingredients (say, flour and water), changes in the ratio will alter your results, especially in baking.”

What is the most accurate form of measurement in baking?

For the Most Accuracy, Use a Kitchen Scale! In most cases, weight is trustier than volume measurements. If a recipe calls for 140 grams of flour, there's no quibbling. But one cup of flour \u2013 even one weighed with the fluff-and-scoop method \u2013 can weigh anywhere between 120 grams or 170 grams.

Why do bakers typically weigh or scale ingredients instead of measuring by volume?

Measuring your baking ingredients using a scale instead of the measuring cups (which measure volume) is the best way to ensure the perfect amount of each ingredient. It might seem like a cup is a cup, but consider the density of your ingredients. A new bag of flour might be more compact than a less full, aerated one.

Is weight the most accurate way to measure ingredients?

It's more accurate. There are no compressibility problems when measuring by weight. Five ounces of flour is always five ounces of flour, no matter how you transfer it to the bowl. This means that every time you bake a given recipe, you're guaranteed that the ratio of ingredients is exactly the same time after time.

Are scales more accurate than measuring cups?

Kitchen scales are tidier, simpler, and more accurate than cups or teaspoons. Americans are not a systematic people, at least not when it comes to measuring out cooking ingredients. Pick up just about any cookbook and you will find a hodgepodge of units\u2014pinches, teaspoons, cups, ounces.



Understanding Weights vs Measures in Baking




More answers regarding is baking by weight really more accurate?

Answer 2

Changes in the weight of ingredients due to humidity are very small compared to changes due to how loose or tight your flour gets packed into the measuring cup.

Weighing the ingredients eliminates one (major) source of measurement error. You'll still have to compensate for other things on your own.

Answer 3

I had the same question and found some old-ish scientific material

According to this, at 21°C, 45 % relative humidity can reduce flour weight by 22 %, 75 % relative humidity can increase flour weight by 15 % from an assumed "normal" 60 % at the same temperature. These values may vary with other base temperature and relative humidity.

Most ingredients are not as prone to density-changes as flour is. Flour can be compacted massively and significantly fluctuates in density, independent of it's moisture content. (see using volume measures to estimate mass to get an idea about the weight range at the same moisture content in the same cup)

So I guess, if your humidity and way of packing into the cup or other volumetric measuring container (e.g. fluff the flour up through sifting, then pack it tightly and level every time to provide reproducible fluffiness) does not change much, you can go with a volumetric measurement for flour just as well as with weight.

With most other things like sugar, butter etc, don't seem to change density and thus can be measured in volume as well as weight, providing you always "level" the ingredient to have reproducible amounts. If you don't level, it's a matter of chance to get the same heap on the top. This is only true for those ingredients you can relatively tightly pack.

I guess, if you want to be super-accurate with flour, you need to calculate the density (which you can do at home) of your flour and then determine the moisture content (which is rather difficult I guess - you could try drying your flour for a couple of hours and then weighing and measuring the volume, but be careful preparing it the same way for the volume every time!).

All up, with flour most good recipes state add more flour or liquid if necessary and I guess that has it's reason...

This may also be related to different qualities of flour which can take up more liquid - or not. It's just a bit annoying if you don't have experience with the necessary texture :)

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Rachel Claire, Rachel Claire, Ron Lach, Jess Loiterton